In The Graveyard Book,
Neil Gaiman comments on modern society’s greed. This is quite similar to
Rudyard Kipling’s The Jungle Book. In
both works, the authors comment on the greed of men and depict a society in
which children, the innocent, are protected from modern society. An outside
world takes in a seemingly special child and gives him the knowledge and senses
necessary to survive without worldly desires. However, taking children out of their atypical developmental environments results in sensible, intelligent characters, as seen from Bod and Mowgli.
In The Jungle Book, Kipling shows an
organized, civilized society of animals that adopt a young boy, Mowgli, and
raise him to be a seemingly more civilized individual than his human
counterparts. Mowgli is taught the Law of the Jungle by Baloo and Bagheera. He
understands how to survive and get by on simply the “bare necessities.”
However, he cannot comprehend the worldly desires of men. When he takes the
bejeweled tusk from the white cobra’s cave, his small act of necessity,
proposing to take the tusk for hunting, results in the deaths of all the white
men exploring the jungle. The men kill each other in order to obtain the tusk
for financial gain. They do not see the practical use of the piece. Rather, the
humans see the tusk as power or a status symbol. Kipling depicts Mowgli
following the trails of each of the men to see exactly how they stepped and how
they were ultimately defeated. Mowgli has a deeper level of thinking than these
men. He can survive while the men slaughter each other for something they could
do without. However, the animals in the jungle are not killing each other. They
are able to hunt and survive with respect for one another. Thus, Kipling
juxtaposes the greedy society of humans falling apart at the seams while the
jungle has an organized system of rules that keeps it intact.
Gaiman
takes Kipling’s commentary a step farther in The Graveyard Book by not only condemning the greed of modern
society, but also suggesting humans look backward to history and their ancestry
to learn how to behave. He does this by using children, similar to Kipling, but
does more with the concept of children having the capacity to understand how to
“live.” Bod is rescued from the man Jack by the people of the graveyard, like
the jungle accepts Mowgli. In Gaiman’s novel, human Life has become so corrupt
in its quest for power that Death is safer. The Jacks are out to possess more
power by killing the boy who can survive on the border of Life and Death. To be
protected from this greed, Bod must live among the dead. In the graveyard, he
learns about history from those who lived it. He passes this along to Scarlett.
Their knowledge of the Romans is surprising to adults, yet the children still
comprehend it. When Scarlett’s father asks, “Where did you hear about the
Romans?” she simply responds with “Everybody knows” (45).Through this scene and
the countless lessons Bod receives in the graveyard, Gaiman shows children
having the ability to learn complex and valuable lessons.
Because children have a greater
brain capacity than credited, they are the perfect place to start the
reformation of society. Thus, though society is corrupt with greed, children
are the solution for both Kipling and Gaiman. Placing children in an
environment absent from this need for power gives them the ability to grow into
sensible adults. In The Graveyard Book,
dancing with the dead lifts the spirits of the townspeople, and the world seems
to be a safer place. So, in teaching children to live a better life, Gaiman
suggests looking to the past, the dead, and learning from history. If children
are taught more about the past and protected from this greed, they will be able
to survive, as seen from the eventual success of Mowgli and Bod. After growing
to adulthood and learning about courage, bravery, respect, and much more, their
atypical environments release them. By depicting this, both authors show the
effectiveness of their developmental proposals.
No comments:
Post a Comment