Dante’s Inferno attempts to depict a posthumous topic that
due to its relation to humanity cannot be proven correct or false by mankind
alone. It is in this intricacy and lack
of understanding of the afterlife that Dante is able to attract readers to his
book and allow those who believe similarly in his faith to consider the
possibilities of this reality. Here,
Dante is able twist reality into his own manipulations and force the readers to
think as he does while avoiding some criticisms of his own creations. One of the more intriguing aspects of Dante’s
Inferno lies in the fact that the author of the story also acts as its lead
character. It is important to realize
this fact in analyzing his work.
The separation between the author Dante and the journeyman
Dante exists at the beginning of the story, but by the end of the story I believe
these two forms of Dante have become the same person altogether which I think
is the point of the entire journey.
Dante could not face sin in the form of the three beasts on the mountain
and must now learn how to in hell.
In distinguishing between the two Dantes, the author Dante is
impartial and strict. He made hell, in a
sense, and sent actual members of his society and those before his own time in
these punishments that he himself has construed. In contrast, Dante the protagonist begins the
story consumed with fear, weakness, and compassion. He is relatable to the audience as one would
assume to show compassion to those that have nothing to look forward to but
suffering. However, throughout the story
Dante appears to harden to the sin around him.
In the beginning he would faint in the sight of the more trivial of
punishments and weeping for the people trapped hopelessly. But by the end, he began to realize his
compassion should be distrusted. To weep
for sin seems counterintuitive to the purpose of hell for which his just God
has created. I believe Dante’s greatest
realization of this truth occurs when he pulls the hair out of the traitor Bocca.
He himself adds suffering to those that sin and do not comply with him.
The realization that the protagonist gains, is what the
author Dante knew all along. There is no
hope for those that did not seek God and repent. What is due to them will be given to them. There will be punishment to those that do
wrong and it is worthless to pity it.
The just God, that He is, assigned the correct punishment for the
correct sin. There is no mistake thus
there should be no pity. Sin is an evil
that Dante must avoid to reach the top of the mountain, possibly a reference to
paradise. (It is important to remember that Virgil is neither God nor a soul of
God’s kingdom. This invalidates his
reasoning for rewarding or disapproving of Dante’s pity. He is led by his own preconceptions and must
learn just as Dante in what to believe.)
No comments:
Post a Comment